http://swpc.noaa.gov/pmap/you might be interested in some science.. mind you this is not algore scientificalness behind manmadeglobalwarming, but the other science that embraces logic as opposed to consensus:
Are people with dark skin harmful to the environment as are rooves and roads? People with dark skin are not doing their part 'for the environment' by having the correct skin tone. Should they be banished from California- or exterminated outright 'for the environment'? Oh, wait, that's eugenics. We already have planned parenthood for that... and the czar ruminating about forced sterilization.
"[building more energy plants endangers the energy plan]" -- Juan Williams
Yes, providing more energy to the grid endangers the destroy the grid plan of socialists. Cap-n-trade? Uh no. Limiting use of electricity in NO way 'saves' electricity. Limiting use of electricity in NO way reduces the need for electricity. Build more nuclear power plants? Yes. 'Energy crisis' solved.
Atheists are ignorant of the logical difficulties (willfully or otherwise). Contratheists, however, rabidly attempt to defend their self refuting ideology, are grossly intolerant of theism, AND actively seek destruction of theism in the public sphere.
The ONLY time Jesus repeated himself so often, and offered no alternative explanation to those who remained- or left at the 'difficulty' of his teaching.
No, I am not saved: I am still alive. Death is a pre-requisite to salvation. His death on the cross earned us redemption and potential salvation.
"Work out your own salvation in fear and trembling" -- Phil 2:12
Salvation is NOT guaranteed per se. Salvation is NOT guaranteed by 'accepting' Jesus as the Christ. The contrary position is frought with logical contradictions.